A web app that tracks exemptions to Oregon Public Records Law? Yes. We just made that.

By December 10, 2014November 10th, 2015No Comments

If you are on this email list, then by now you know it’s been redacted. Not so much inked over as scrubbed from view. Curtained. Exempt, as they say, from disclosure.

Up until January of last year, it was a public record, compiled as part of former Attorney General John Kroger’s perhaps naive effort at transparency reform in Oregon. For a couple of glorious years, this list united like minds in the mission to daylight the beaver state. As we all now know, that undertaking evaporated. Ironically, this email list nearly also disappeared when Rep. Dennis Richardson’s run at publicly available emails earned email lists an exemption to Oregon Public Records Law in 2013.[1]

Just another blow to a once-lauded Sunshine Law that is now dying its death of a thousand cuts. We’re already nearly halfway there.

At last count there were 478 exemptions to the law. That is not the news. What is the news is that, in the spirit of the transparency reform that brought us all to this list in the first place, InvestigateWest has put those exemptions in one place: Redacted, a searchable web app of OPRL exemptions.

If you use this law, then you know that the buckshot of exemptions has scattered wide over the Oregon Revised Statutes. It’s pretty hard to find your way around these things. This is our attempt to make it easier.

We hope you will find it useful, as I have, in structuring requests for information. Search by word, by ORS chapter, or by topic or agency, and Redacted spits back matching exemptions. Having them in hand while writing requests has been immensely useful to me in understanding the limits of the law. It also saves me valuable time and energy otherwise spent running into dark legal corners.

For the government employees whose job it is to respond to such requests, we have included the penalties for violating the law in cases where penalties apply. We know that you struggle, as we do, with the disorganization of these rules. It’s no joke to face a felony for releasing something by mistake. So we noted penalties where they exist, and hope doing so can release at least some of the paralysis otherwise inflicted by the law’s untidiness.

One caveat: the app does not yet include the exemption that almost cloaked this email list, and a handful of other recently enacted rules. It’s a work in progress. Please do keep us on our toes as we update it.

We are grateful to have gotten this far, and owe a thanks to the folks at the Oregon Department of Justice, who recognized quickly that redacting an email list dedicated to state transparency was a move packed with irony. To those of you who opted into communications from InvestigateWest through DOJ’s email to you, thanks for your vote of confidence. I was glad to hear from people about their own transparency challenges since the list was last active. Do keep those stories coming.

Meanwhile, through Redacted, I’ll continue to bring you monthly missives on our state’s state of transparency: loopholes, the stories behind the exemptions, the inevitably proposed new ones. I’m also happy to tackle the issues you bring me as well, and to use this newsletter as a landing pad for the transparency mission that united us in the first place.

Who am I? I’m a 10-year veteran of Oregon newsrooms turned national freelancer and correspondent. I recently joined the staff at InvestigateWest, the first 501(c)3, nonprofit journalism studio in the Pacific Northwest, in their effort to build an Oregon program.

We are not your cookie-cutter journalists. InvestigateWest was founded by ex-pats from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer following the closure of that paper. That is shorthand for saying the people that birthed this organization were so committed to investigative journalism and transparency that they built a nimble new media model on a foundation of pink slips.

In five years they have successfully established a nonprofit model for public-service journalism where none existed.

Here’s how it works: we invest in original reporting — on public health, the environment, and government accountability — to produce powerful stories with a clear public service mission. We partner with commercial media and public broadcasters in that effort, increasing the capacity for fact-based reporting across the region. Last year we worked with more than a dozen newsrooms to produce three dozen stories that were read, watched, or listened to nearly 3.8 million times.

Though InvestigateWest has reported in Oregon since launching in 2009, and I have been involved with the organization as a contractor, we just formally embarked on a dedicated Oregon expansion with support from Meyer Memorial Trust. Our mission is to strengthen communities, engage citizens in civic life, and help set the policy agenda in the Northwest through independent investigative and explanatory journalism. It’s also to bring tools like Redacted into wider use by the public and by journalists.

Enjoy. Feel free to share. And please stay tuned.


[1] Richardson’s digital zealotry earned him the moniker ‘Spam King’ among foes, and in 2012 crashed the Oregon Legislature’s server. At one time, he had email addresses equivalent to one in eight Oregonians. You have to applaud the effort, if not the result.

Lee van der Voo

Lee van der Voo

Lee van der Voo is managing director of InvestigateWest. She coordinates and reports on projects in Oregon. She can be reached at

Leave a Reply